BREAKING: BIDEN BRIBED…BURISMA ADMITS PAYMENTS TO JOE…

By CD Media

This story is developing…

KYIV — The Pechersk District Court of Kyiv dismissed the claim of Ukrainian gas holding company Burisma against People’s Deputy of Ukraine Andriy Derkach. The court decision says that representatives of Burisma demanded a refutation of the information they paid $ 900,000 to ex-Vice President Joe Biden for lobbying activities, and to his son Hunter Biden, along with Alexander Kwasniewski, Alan Apter and Devon Archer, $ 16 , 5 million.

“Burisma admitted that it had given a bribe to Joe Biden. As expected, Burisma lost. ( in fact – gave a bribe) 900 thousand dollars for lobbying to former US Vice President Joe Biden, “ wrote Derkatch on his Facebook page.

The court separately noted: Burisma in its statement actually does not dispute the facts of payments – only their size. That is, it agrees that it paid Biden and his son, but does not agree that these are the amounts. The fight against international democraturation continues. – follow the announcement “, – said Andriy Derkach.

Below is a statement from former prosecutor Viktor Shokin. Shokin was fired by the Ukrainian government after pressure by then Vice President Joe Biden. Shokin was investigating Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, at the time.

Who in their right mind would ever vote to let those two crooks into the White House?? – The Liberator

46 thoughts on “BREAKING: BIDEN BRIBED…BURISMA ADMITS PAYMENTS TO JOE…”

  1. Look, I’m all for exposing Biden’s corruption, but is this document actually real? Why would an official Ukrainian legal document be written in English? Also, it looks like a 7th grader’s word document.

    1. It is not a legal document, it is a petition to the prosecutor to ask a number of questions during a pre-trial, and it does provide nothing but questions. Some questions might be accusing, but they do not provide the slightest bit of evidence against anyone. It has been provided in english, so that people who do not care to spend time into reading it, would just take home the headline and claims by the blog author in their mind. It works mainly for people who read such articles with a strong bias and do not actually care on its true content, they remember to have seen the “evidence” and carry the word.

  2. I just had a closer look at the scans you provided. There is no hint of any proof, this is a petition to open a pre-trial investigation and providing a number of questions. Shokin was not fired for investigations into Burisma, but for the lack of such investigation, because he was deeply involved in corruption himself. Biden forced the Ukraine to open investigation into Burisma, while his sone was working there. I would be cautious if a known corrupt character is coming up with such stuff right in front of an election.

    1. This is what is so amazing about the Left. Regardless of the mountain of evidence to the contrary, they will always spin things in support of their position. Always. Joe Biden is profoundly dishonest and corrupt to his core and a serial sexual harasser, but now it’s OK because he is running for president. Dude, it is on video. He even bragged about his blatant influence peddling. His entire family has been enriched by his personal corruption. He has been caught red-handed suggesting the Logan Act, etc., etc. and yet you Looney Leftists blindly and blithely support him knowing full well that he is perhaps the most corrupt politician in Washington. Why the hell do you think Obama picked him as his VP? Obama knew Biden would do his dirty work while also delivering the goods and help make the Obamas filthy rich at the expense of the people. Meanwhile, Trump is donating his salary to worthy causes as you knuckleheads try to impeach him. Why don’t you just admit that you hate Trump’s policies and save us all a lot of time?

      1. Dude, I actually watched that video, and it kind of says the opposite of what you are claiming. Biden was following official US politics to force Ukraine to fire Shokin. Because Shokin was not doing his job in investigating corruption. Biden actually caused him to be replaced with one who then actually investigated Burisma, while his son was still working there. If Burisma would have paid the Bidens, this would be the opposite of the expected result, wouldn’t it?

        1. Yeah…I know this is a bit aged. But that IS NOT the case here. There is NO US policy to force any foreign government to fire anyone in their government. Also, there is a completed investigation by Shokin and by the Latvian government proving without doubt that US aid was sent to NGOs who then wrote checks as loans to another company and then they wrote checks to Hunter Biden and Devin Archer. It was BLATANT money laundering.

        1. What has Biden don in sexual harassment that Trump didn’t do much more often, more serious and more proudly of it?

          1. Disgusting bro. The countless videos of Biden petting, sniffing, and touching kids and women during photo ops. Just watch those videos and if you don’t feel any empathy for those kids than you might be a predator yourself. Put aside your political beliefs and examine the behavior of Joe Biden. Be critical. Use your mind.

          2. Yeah I see your point. He is so more pervert than Trump who has boasted with grabbing women by the pussy, storming into the changing rooms of his pagenat contestants to see them nude, and who has about 30 know cases of sexual harassment on account. Snffing hair of a woman or petting a child is a total no-go.

      1. No…he’s still sleeping. Joe Biden’s own family calls him Pedo Pete. His daughter wrote about Joe taking showers with her. Trump said “I could grab them by the pussy if I wanted to. That’s what they would let you do when you’re famous”. He never said he did…said he could. And even if he did…if adult women want a piece of a billionaire…then that’s their business. Unlike Biden who likes to sniff and caress little children. And this guy was still talking about the women who came forth (right before the election none the less) about Trump sexual assault…note they weren’t criminal charges, just civil cases. Also note that the were all dropped. The most famous case was the girl who claimed she was assaulted by Trump and Epstein…who later confessed to lying, was in and out of drug treatment centers and her lawyers voluntarily dropped the case the day after the election in 2016. Nothing suspect about that at all! LOL. This guy even admits he’s a hack…Hackemesser (Hackmeister). Can’t make it up.

    2. “ Shokin was not fired for investigations into Burisma, but for the lack of such investigation, because he was deeply involved in corruption himself. ”

      And you were told that by who? BIDEN and his “media”?

      Here’s a 1 minute video of Biden bragging, how he used a billion $ U.S. taxpayer -funded loan guarantee to force Ukraine to fire a prosecutor investigating Biden’s son on corruption. https://youtu.be/UXA—dj2-CY

      1. A safe bet on anything coming out of the mouths of the Biden regime is to assume it’s a lie.

      2. The video you shared is unavaiable but I am quite sure I know the clip you are pointing to it. In this clip he is bragging about getting the prosecutor fired yes – but he does not in any way mention that he was doing this because of his son (go back and prove me wrong). What this clip is not mentioning – and where you do not know or present the correct context – is, that it was the US presidents decision to force the prosecutor to be fired, because they were corrupt and NOT investigating in companies like Burisma.
        You find more context here: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/03/what-really-happened-when-biden-forced-out-ukraines-top-prosecutor/3785620002/ and I am so nice and quote it for those still unbiased enough to take in facts contradicting their opinion:
        [quote]
        A whistleblower complaint centering on President Donald Trump’s phone call with the Ukrainian president has spurred a number of allegations and counterallegations as Republicans and Democrats jockey for position amid an impeachment inquiry.

        At the heart of Congress’ probe into the president’s actions is his claim that former Vice President and 2020 Democratic frontrunner Joe Biden strong-armed the Ukrainian government to fire its top prosecutor in order to thwart an investigation into a company tied to his son, Hunter Biden.

        But sources ranging from former Obama administration officials to an anti-corruption advocate in Ukraine say the official, Viktor Shokin, was ousted for the opposite reason Trump and his allies claim.

        It wasn’t because Shokin was investigating a natural gas company tied to Biden’s son; it was because Shokin wasn’t pursuing corruption among the country’s politicians, according to a Ukrainian official and four former American officials who specialized in Ukraine and Europe.
        Shokin’s inaction prompted international calls for his ouster and ultimately resulted in his removal by Ukraine’s parliament.
        Without pressure from Joe Biden, European diplomats, the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations, Shokin would not have been fired, said Daria Kaleniuk, co-founder and executive director of the Anti Corruption Action Centre in Kiev.
        “Civil society organizations in Ukraine were pressing for his resignation,” Kaleniuk said, “but no one would have cared if there had not been voices from outside this country calling on him to go.”
        […]Trump and his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani claim Biden did this to quash Shokin’s investigation into Ukraine’s largest gas company, Burisma Holdings, and its owner, oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky.
        They say this benefited Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, who served on Burisma’s board of directors – for which he was paid $50,000 a month.
        Their assertion is contradicted by former diplomatic officials who were following the issue at the time.
        Burisma Holdings was not under scrutiny at the time Joe Biden called for Shokin’s ouster, according to the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, an independent agency set up in 2014 that has worked closely with the FBI.
        Shokin’s office had investigated Burisma, but the probe focused on a period before Hunter Biden joined the company, according to the anti-corruption bureau.
        The investigation dealt with the Ministry of Ecology, which allegedly granted special permits to Burisma between 2010 and 2012, the agency said. Hunter Biden did not join the company until 2014.

        1. Isn’t it interesting how the Left (people like you) always have an “alternate story”; emphasis on “story”. In polite company they are called bald-faced lies. What those of us who are informed know is that the Left are experts at propaganda. They can sell you shit and make you think it is chocolate. Get lost with your lies. Literally nobody believes them because everyone knows Biden as a career liar and complete fraud. In case you missed it, there was an “impeachment” trial over this very matter with the goal of the Swamp being to remove Trump from office and they came up empty. Why is that? Think hard.

          1. >>Isn’t it interesting how the Left (people like you) always have an “alternate story” emphasis on “story”.

            Isn’t it also interesting that the alternative right (people like you) considers everybody left who does not follow their biased, screwed and qanonized view of reality? There is a natural, recorded order of things and that was plainly described, and it is actually the accusers (people like you) that should bring forward solid evidence instead of reading between the lines of a stage chat.

          2. Thank you for your effort. Did you also read https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/media/minority-media/peters-wyden-respond-to-republican-effort-to-amplify-russian-disinformation-and-manufacture-dirt-on-vice-president-biden ?
            Quote:
            State Department communications and detailed, lengthy interviews with former and current officials clearly demonstrate that U.S. policy during the Obama Administration was not influenced in any manner to assist Burisma or Hunter Biden. Vice President Biden did not alter U.S. policies toward Ukraine in any way to benefit Burisma or his son. To the contrary, all the evidence shows the normal interagency policy process was driven solely by the national interest. U.S. policy to call for the removal of Prosecutor General Shokin was contrary to Burisma’s interest
            Vice President Joe Biden’s public condemnation of Ukraine’s Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin and advocacy for Shokin’s dismissal, was a U.S foreign policy priority and was not, as the Majority alleges, an attempt to halt a corruption investigation into Burisma’s owner. State Department officials interviewed in this investigation explained that Shokin did not pursue corruption investigations against Burisma’s owner, effectively shielding the owner from prosecution, and that removing Shokin made an investigation into Burisma more, not less, likely. The Senate Ukraine Caucus, including Chairman Johnson himself, supported the United States policy advocating for the removal of Prosecutor General Shokin.
            There is no evidence that any action of the U.S. government or any U.S. official was taken to benefit Burisma or Hunter Biden. On the contrary, and testimony obtained by the Committees indicate persistent, negative views of Burisma among key officials.

          3. That is called a cover-up, you moron. You know what happened in Ukraine but for partisan reasons, you choose to spread the lie. You also know what happened on Nov. 3, 2020 but don’t give a damn because your type – Leftists, Marxists, Lunatic Believers in a Socialist/Communist Utopia – will do whatever it takes to “win”. What are you going to say about Biden when it is proven beyond doubt that he and his cabal stole the 2020 presidential election and numerous down-ballet races nationwide and people start going to prison? Let me guess..”Who you gonna believe? Me, or your lying eyes?” Will that be your refrain? You people on the Left lie as a core strategy, but the people are now on to you. The 2022 election will be a bloodbath, and 2024 will be one for the record books. Buckle up!

          4. I am totally aware of that the coming elections will be a blood bath for the Democrat party. America as a free and democratic republic fuinally ceases to exists, and you will finally have the totalitarian government the German American Bund was always dreaming of, with Godking Trump and his family at the top. Then the big purge will happen, that will render the German Night of Long Knives amateurish. Hail.
            It is unavoidable that those who do not learn from history will have to repeat it.

  3. The better question than “Who in their right mind would ever vote to let those two crooks into the White House??” is why would he be the worse option compared to the russian asset in Chief? And what indication do you have that Biden will apply the same nepotism that Trump did?

    1. So your OPINION is superior to my OPINION why? Is there just ONE – just ONE – Biden supporter who has the courage and strength of character to admit that the guy is a career criminal? Just one.

      1. Your claim of “career criminal” would not stand in court yet. You have not provided proof that Biden was corrupted in this case, or any other case yet. What you have provided in this article is a petition to interview in regards to a lot of questions. In english. In the name of, but not signed by a man who was proovenly involved in corruption, after the president’s private lawyer was going into the Ukraine to push them to provide support, or else.

        1. When you have this much perceived or not corruption , where there is smoke There is fire. Trump did nothing and was investigated by FBI,CIA, big tech, and the media. If you want fairness then let them investigate. Biden supporters think he is untouchable but 48 years of this (Come on man)

          1. Where there is so much smoke the President’s private lawyer went to to “convince” the Ukraine officials to report publicly to open investigations, after the president illegally withheld military aid money already granted by the congress, and he made a “perfect call” with the Ukraine’s leader, telling him he would love to give him the money, they should do him a favor though…

        2. No proof Biden is on camera bragging that Obama wasn’t going to give one penny unless they fired the prosecutor… is that not good enough?

          1. Biden explained why the payments were withheld in the video. Ukraines prosecutor was the corrupt one, who resisted to investigate corruption. That is why money was withheld, and it was not an illegal move.
            Read for example https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/03/what-really-happened-when-biden-forced-out-ukraines-top-prosecutor/3785620002/
            Quote:
            >>At the heart of Congress’ probe into the president’s actions is his claim that former Vice President and 2020 Democratic frontrunner Joe Biden strong-armed the Ukrainian government to fire its top prosecutor in order to thwart an investigation into a company tied to his son, Hunter Biden.
            >>But sources ranging from former Obama administration officials to an anti-corruption advocate in Ukraine say the official, Viktor Shokin, was ousted for the opposite reason Trump and his allies claim.
            >>It wasn’t because Shokin was investigating a natural gas company tied to Biden’s son; it was because Shokin wasn’t pursuing corruption among the country’s politicians, according to a Ukrainian official and four former American officials who specialized in Ukraine and Europe.
            >>Shokin’s inaction prompted international calls for his ouster and ultimately resulted in his removal by Ukraine’s parliament.
            Without pressure from Joe Biden, European diplomats, the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations, Shokin would not have been fired, said Daria Kaleniuk, co-founder and executive director of the Anti Corruption Action Centre in Kiev.
            >>”Civil society organizations in Ukraine were pressing for his resignation,” Kaleniuk said, “but no one would have cared if there had not been voices from outside this country calling on him to go.”

          2. “Former Obama administration officials…” Whey would they ever lie to protect Biden? Bahahahawawahaha!!

            Hey, while we’re at it, let’s talk about Hunter’s laptop, or Bobolinski’s claims, shall we? Or maybe we can talk about Joe’s net worth. Ho, wait…he was just a great investor, you know, like Hillary. And then there’s Joe’s extended family. Clean as a whistle, right?

            You’re a real beauty, Kai. Go get a dose of reality and then get back to us.

          3. I have the assumption, you are the one who needs to review their reality. Too much QAnon shit and Trumpism blurred your view.
            Hunter Biden’s notebook went through hands of very questionable people, has been delivered to a legally blind man by a person identifying himself as Hunter Biden but no proof he was actually Hunter, and he never appeared to pick it up again. Doesn’t that smell a little like placed evidence?
            https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/how-fake-persona-laid-groundwork-hunter-biden-conspiracy-deluge-n1245387

          4. Your choice of words does not hurt me. I know the source, it’s all you have to offer when you run out of arguments.

      2. No, the facts are superior to your opinion. Your “evidence” is blatantly bullshit. No one would file a court proceeding in a Ukrainian court in English, just as no one here would file one in Spanish.

        Are you so fucking stupid that you don’t know that other countries conduct official business in their native language?

        People like you spreading bullshit turned my father from a reasonable conservative who shared my values into a vacuuous bullshitter like yourself spreading nonsense and conspiracy theories.

        Fuck you and fuck your Russian handlers/sources.

        1. Typical liberal drivel, focusing on minor points such as the language in which a court proceeding was written to refute the factual piece written by the very credible CD Media. Nobody is spreading bullshit but you, except in your case it is disinformation. Stick to the facts presented in the piece…and work on YOUR language, it’s despicable, as are you.

    2. Holy crap. The Russian Hoax has been debunked, proven wrong, incorrect, fake, a lie, inaccurate – how many times does that have to be repeated? Jeez. The Ukrainian Govt has verified they paid bribes to Joe Biden. They said he laundered $4 BILLION thru Ukraine! Yet you distract from that news with Russia?! 🙄

        1. You are a Lib Koo-Aid drinker who only reads one side of any political story. You do no due diligence because you are a true believer. You are a complete waste of time.

    3. This site is messed up. No matter what I comment, they say it’s a duplicate comment. I HAVE NEVER COMMENTED ON THIS SITE BEFORE. AND I BEVER WILL AGAIN!

      1. Sorry. It must have been because you had a comment I had not yet approved. Please try again as your first comment has been approved. If I don’t pre-approve comments I will get hacked to death.

  4. I’m a bit suspicious that a statement by Victor Shokin is written in English and not Ukrainian..

    This story is most likely, false.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *